[Respond Code Three]

"Yes, and how convenient that the NYC cops did not seek his arrest until AFTER he videoed one of their “finest” committing an, at best, questionable, and at worst, illegal act. Funny the timing of that circumstance."

It may be convenient, but if he broke the law he cannot complain. The police are not obligated to let someone break laws because it might look convenient.

"His past record notwithstanding, his present circumstance neither diminishes nor abrogates the act he captured and publicly exposed."

I agree. It stands on its merits.

The rest of your comments fall within "broad brush" accusations, so I'll pass.

[kiryandil]

The police are not obligated to let someone break laws because it might look convenient.

Well, unless it's Bill Clinton and most of the Democrat Party leadership...

[kiryandil]

The police are not obligated to let someone break laws because it might look convenient.

I think the Wehrmacht term for their military police was Kettenhunde (chained dogs) - quite apropos for our US sojer-wannabes, who bark & bite at the pleasure of our un-arrested felonious political masters...