Posted on 08/02/2014 8:12:41 PM PDT by ObamahatesPACoal
Speaking at the 134th Annual Fancy Farm Picnic, Saturday…
There once was a woman from Kentucky
Who thought in politics, she’d be lucky
So she flew to LA for a Hollywood bash
She came home in a flash, with a bucket of cash
To liberals she whispers ‘coal makes you sick’
In Kentucky she claims, ‘coal makes us tick’
(SNIP)
(Excerpt) Read more at mofopolitics.com ...
Ditch Mitch.
LOL, good one
empty skirt
Ditch Mitch.
If you believe Grimes winning would be good for the USA, ....
Never mind.
srsly? you would srsly flip a senate seat because he’s not “pure” enough for you?
a vote for grimes is a vote for harry reid as senate majority leader. if that is what you are saying, you should be required to explain why.
McConnell is not only not pure he has no principles and is an incompetent senate leader. Sometimes one must sacrifice these types of Republicans for the greater good.
Mitch losing would be good for America.
Can we root against both of them?
What will Mitch do as Senate Leader to benefit the country from 2015 to 2017 (when the 'rats are likely to regain the Senate)?
She’d cast her first vote for Harry Reid
Rand got that one right.
Jason Lewis apparently went "Galt" the other day....
That is their explanation, it’s much of the reason we have Obama instead of Romney. If a republican who is mostly fiscally conservative, has common sense ideas and solutions, but doesn’t want to tackle social issues that they are against, then they won’t vote for them. It’s a common trend, and it’s disgusting. You’re not going to find a perfect politician, especially in America. Therefore, we get politicians that wouldn’t even be hired as a manager at a McDonald’s, or able to open and run a small business successfully trying to manage a country. Besides that, these people are reacting very poorly to international and domestic issues. These politicians that we are cursed with live in a fantasy world. Voting for someone that cannot win is essentially a vote for these people that I would not trust to walk a dog, or serve me food.
But too bad, not good enough for me, well I WANT OBAMA! It’s sickening.
it’s insane to advocate the sacrifice of a perfectly winnable senate seat because he doesn’t meet your personal definition of “conservative”.
what will harry reid do as senate majority leader?
you’re not just wrong on this one. you’re flirting with immoral.
What is Mitch going to do as Senate Leader in the next two years?
I can see that having Ted Cruz as House Speaker during that time could work wonders compared to what Mitch would possibly do.
Answer the question.
you are advocating a vote for harry reid as senate majority leader. your question doesn’t dignify an answer.
period.
Mitch McConnell has declared war on the TEA Party, he has declared his intention to see that conservative candidates are defunded and groups that donate to them are scrutinized and ostracised by the GOPe.
I wouldn’t advocate that people vote Democrat. I also would never expect anyone to cast a vote for McConnell.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.