Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dilbert San Diego
I think one point that is being conveniently forgotten is that this country by the Summer of 1945 was very War weary.
The possibility of Invading Japan or even blockading them for any extended time till surrender were concepts that the American Public may not have been willing to do if the option of dropping the Bomb would end the war once and for all immediately.
174 posted on 08/03/2014 8:05:54 AM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Captain Peter Blood

Good points.

I have read that President Truman was interested in using the A-bomb for this very reason, that it was hoped it would bring a quick end to the war.

The war could have dragged on for years if we didn’t use the bomb. A conventional invasion of Japan would have resulted in many more casualties, on both sides, than the number who died at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Liberal revisionist historians condemn the atomic bomb, but tend not to condemn the firebombing of Tokyo, or the bombing of Dresden as harshly. It’s as if liberals are ok with people dying with conventional weapons, but somehow, using an atomic bomb was not proper.


175 posted on 08/03/2014 8:12:48 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson