Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vermont Lt
Wow. I guess the whole franchise model just went kaput. Does this mean that the corporate liability for an employee just went from the franchisee to the corporation? I am sure that all of the franchise operators—from fast food to hotels—are going to love that.

It all depends on the wording in the franchise agreement.
It could result in the franchiser being stuck with the cost in which case they will probably go bankrupt and reorganizing differently.

What is Tortious interference? And can the government be sued for it?

64 posted on 07/30/2014 2:05:31 PM PDT by oldbrowser (We have a rogue government in Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: oldbrowser

I understand what you are writing. I agree that is the way things “should” be understood. But this clown at the NLRB just indicated that even though your Burger King is owned by “ABC Burger, LLC”, the minimum wage employees are also employees of Burger King, Inc.

That NLRB guy must have X powers or something to be able to add language and meaning to a non-governmental private business contract.


73 posted on 07/30/2014 2:20:40 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (If you want to keep your dignity, you can keep it. Period........ Just kidding, you can't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson