Posted on 07/30/2014 12:46:11 PM PDT by Q-ManRN
As a pediatrician, I have one, straightforward professional obligation: to safeguard and support the health and wellbeing of my patients. In my case, those patients are children, but you could change the age range of the people coming into the office and apply that statement to any medical provider.
Asking about guns in the house is no exception. When I ask parents if there are firearms in the home, and if so how they are secured, it is for the sole purpose of keeping their children safe.
Physicians in Florida are being threatened with a law that, if enacted, will seriously hamper their ability to do their jobs. The Firearms Owners' Privacy Act, passed in 2011, would subject medical providers to fines and a potential loss of licensure for asking patients about gun ownership or recording that information in the medical record if it is not relevant to the patient's medical care or safety.
Gun advocacy groups such as the National Rifle Association have long opposed the AAPs efforts to strengthen gun laws. But the Florida law has no effect on gun ownership or access. Its insidious reach enters into medical offices and chokes off the free-speech rights of the people trying to work there.
As much as the NRA and its ilk want to deny it, having a gun in the home is a risk factor for serious injury or death. Acknowledging that fact is not the same thing as taking the gun away. The Florida law seeks to protect gun owners from even having to be informed about truths theyd prefer to ignore, and seeks to cast medical providers in an unflattering light for having the temerity to question them.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...
I know exactly what you're talking about. Doctors ask more questions these days about alcohol use (how many drinks/day?), smoking (how much or when did you quit?), caffeine (how many cups of coffee/day?), dizzy spells, falling, forgetfulness, etc., etc., etc. And I know that many of these questions are not relevant to my circumstances.
But I don't want the government to decide for my doctor what questions he can or cannot ask!
For people who don't want to be asked certain questions, a better solutions is for them to simply decline to answer or, if they don't even want particular questions asked, they can (when making the appointment to see a new doctor) ask for a commitment that the doctor will not ask certain questions.
We don't need more government regulations in the health care field. We need less, not more, government.
I like the sued question. It’s all about safety.
I’m due for some minor surgery in the fall, and the surgeon demanded I quit smoking, for a month beforehand.
I told him that he’s the body-shop, I’m the car: I need a fender repair, and I’m not going to change the transmission because he can’t drive a standard.
When we moved to Tennessee, that question was on the form when registering with our Primary Care Physician. We have no kids, so the info they’re gathering has nothing to do with child safety. It’s data mining for Hussein’s militia when the time comes.
I told him that hes the body-shop, Im the car: I need a fender repair, and Im not going to change the transmission because he cant drive a standard.
Cool. I support what both of you said and did. I just don't think that there's any need for the government to regulate your conversations. If a surgeon demands that a patient quit smoking, that's cool. Similarly, I think the patient should be able to demand that the surgeon abstain from alcohol or pot for a month before surgery. Doctor and patient should be able to speak freely. Maybe they can work out an agreement; maybe not.
“Doctors ask more questions these days about alcohol use (how many drinks/day?), smoking (how much or when did you quit?), caffeine (how many cups of coffee/day?), dizzy spells, falling, forgetfulness, etc., etc., etc. And I know that many of these questions are not relevant to my circumstances.”
Your last sentence is the real issue. For most of us, none of those questions are relevant to our reason for our visits, and are consequentially inappropriate. But the doctors are heeling to the government “data collectors” who, from my perspective have an agenda which might not comport with our own personal view of things. The other issue that I am having is our medical group (which is affiliated now with a local hospital) is in the throes of converting to an all electronic medical records system. So now I get a printout of my various medical issues at the conclusion of my visit. The only problem is there are serious inaccuracies that I find necessary to challenge. It would appear that they are “trying to load me up” with things for which there have been no diagnostic tests and no prior discussion. My concern is that the end result could be denial of care based on the fact that I have ended up being a poor specimen, but that denial would be based on false entries. So I am challenging every one and they are being removed from my record. Everyone should be on guard now that doctors are busily typing away on their laptops during the exam that what they are entering is factual and is supported by accurate diagnostics.
“.. have a right..”
Hmm. Is that a constitutional right?
- Post the name, address, phone numbers of any physician asking children about their parents firearms or any possessions in they homes on the internet.
- “Beware” should lighten the load of patients for this NAZI -
Then the nanny state luvin docs better damn well also ask at every visit about:
Knives
Trampolines
Swimming pools
Bicycles
Skateboards
Roller blades
Paintball & air soft guns
Slingshots
Household chemicals
Liquor
Medicines
Pets
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.