Your premise of your argument is that secular scientists hold there own resposible for their work, and scientists who beleive in God do not. How do you know that all these scientists were secular? If any of these scientists that held Obokata accountable beleived that their is a God, your argument is nullified.
Not at all. This whole "secular scientists" as atheists construct is yours to begin with--it'd be more accurate to say that if any scientist who accepts global warming (or whatever it is you think "secular scientists" think about homosexuality or abortion) believes in God, your argument is nullified.
As I said before, most scientists believe in God. And most of them don't let their belief get in the way of doing good science, which includes holding other scientists responsible for their work. This is different from ICR, which allows Brian Thomas and others to continually publish false and misleading material without ever issuing a retraction or, apparently, telling him to shape up.