Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fifedom

‘They also have not built any dams or reservoirs for decades.’

A huge part of the problem. Such things cause environmentalists to have fits though. How dare we alter the natural environment...


24 posted on 07/27/2014 9:46:24 PM PDT by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Bogey78O; fifedom
All of the desirable dam sites have been built. So it is the ratio of surface area to volume which defines the water loss to evaporation.

A narrow deep lake versus a broad shallow lake.

How much land is needed affects cost and you have to take somebody's land. The cost of the dam goes up. The longer the dam, the more ancient river beds there are which increases the risk of dam failure, which requires more soil testing, which isn't fullproof. The broad shallow lakes also silt up faster.

There are a number of these broad shallow lakes in west Texas which are presently bone dry. And Dallas is planning on building one.

OTOH, there is room for two more dams on the Colorado River but they would be in the Grand Canyon.

35 posted on 07/28/2014 5:35:57 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson