And of course she’s not a hard left Margret Sanger euthanasia nut promoting national socialist agendas.
The bottom line of the “climate change” movement: there have to be fewer people, one way or another.
If people are bad for the environment, why should the public be paying for children for anyone who can’t naturally have them, no matter what the reason? That money could be used to prevent healthy people from having children!
Compare the arrogance and self absorbed sanctimony of this women who wishes to deny life to anyone who threatens her privileged lifestyle with the story below
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3185632/posts
She is one of those people who dream of the day when all children are murdered and another 100 million wretched humans are delivered to the pits for burning in order that the privileged might live out their fantasies.
She's a left-wing screwball.
How about we just blow Boston off the face of the earth, that will wipe out a huge number of unneeded people and over the long run Dramatically decrease “America’s carbon footprint”
If bostinites were really worried about it they would euthanize themselves.
What happened to freedom???????
Fertility clinics are pure medical care in most states not screwed up by insurance, just like cosmetic surgery. Business model: supply, demand. People come in, pay, are treated.
And anyone should be able to have children and as many as they can afford.
From some of her other writings: “The health care system is too pervasive and significant an establishment to disregard its environmental effects or exempt it from environmental ethics. The integrity of the health care system and the consumption of medical goods should be assessed in light of environmental sustainability. Medicine and its attendant branches can become “green” through conservation and aiming at integrating green bioethics into its developments, techniques, and procedures.”