To: Milton Miteybad
Well, I’m one that mentioned to another here the degree was versatile without this specific quality being mentioned to me beforehand. And since I’m not trying promote the high cost of education, I must conclude you’re probably mistaken in your supposition — at least in the context of my post you criticized. Furthermore, the type of degree was never specified despite your restriction to J.D. Where was the relative’s graduate-level costs of education stated — a vital factor to your complaint?
I gather you’re not familiar with the value of business professionals educated in law, especially in the areas of contract, health, and patent law.
40 posted on
07/27/2014 5:17:02 PM PDT by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: Gene Eric
Where was the relatives graduate-level costs of education stated a vital factor to your complaint?
I don't recall that it was, not that it makes any difference. A year at even the most mediocre law school is going for $40-$60K, including the cost of living. If "the relative" received a full free ride through law school, then perhaps he/she may eventually achieve a benefit-to-cost ratio above 1.0000. Most law graduates these days aren't so fortunate.
I gather youre not familiar with the value of business professionals educated in law, especially in the areas of contract, health, and patent law.
To the contrary, with 34 eminently successful years in business selling similar services, I would say I have a better-than-average idea of the value of such personnel. I also know that those skills don't necessarily have to come in a package wrapped in a J.D. degree.
41 posted on
07/27/2014 6:14:16 PM PDT by
Milton Miteybad
(I am Jim Thompson. {Really.})
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson