Considering the Clintons have only one child, their daughter, and they have the money, why shouldn’t they use that money to give her a home to share with her husband and a place to raise her child. I have no problem with parents helping their responsible child out that way. And she seems a bit odd, but responsible, not a drug addict or shopaholic.
,
My parents only had me and if they could have afforded it, I’m sure they would have done the same for me, as long as I showed I was not irresponsible, a drug addict or a shopaholic. The think I find the Clintons helping their daughter out financially less offensive then hearing people actually hire Chelsea to talk at $75,000. a speech. I find that ridiculous and irresponsible of the folks who pays such fees for people to talk of all things.
In a normal family you would be correct. They ain’t normal— no way. Avarice, perversion, arrogance and self-righteous venture socialists of the German persuasion. Always “other people’s money” that they “don’t care about”. Liars of the first order.
My daughters ex has parents with quite a bit of money. They have bought him a home, etc. He works and makes good money. I have said why wouldn’t they spend it on him? They are getting old and it will all be his eventually anyway (he is an only child). At least they are seeing him benefit from it and not making him wait til they die.