To: SoConPubbie
You try apprehending someone on the border.
I would not want the legal fall out.
There are laws that tie the border states hands.
This is exactly why we need a president from a border state in DC if we hope to correct the situation.
65 posted on
07/24/2014 9:04:57 AM PDT by
mylife
To: mylife
You try apprehending someone on the border.
I would not want the legal fall out.
There are laws that tie the border states hands.
This is exactly why we need a president from a border state in DC if we hope to correct the situation.
If Perry is not up to the demands and challenges of being a leader in this situation, how would he make a Good President?
66 posted on
07/24/2014 9:06:16 AM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: mylife
You try apprehending someone on the border.
I would not want the legal fall out. Why apprehend? It's an invasion; lethal force is obviously the proper response.
The TX constitution gives the governor the authority to use the national guard to repel invasion — leaving that aside, to assert that the states cannot make such a provision in their constitutions is to assert that the states lack all sovereignty and are merely strictly subservient to the federal government.
77 posted on
07/24/2014 12:40:35 PM PDT by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson