“Which means their fiduciary duty will be to adjust their 2015 rates to reflect the assumption that the subsidies won’t be there/will be revoked. Possibly with the subsidies needing to be repaid.
If so, this Fall’s election just got a whole lot more interesting.”
Hadn’t thought of that aspect.
Someone posted here that the ruling also said employers were not mandated to offer coverage in states without a state exchange.
Those 2 issues will make November fun to watch, since I gather the full court won’t be hearing the case before then.
Keep in mind that the employer mandate hasn’t gone into effect yet.