Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldNavyVet

I have thought about it, a great deal. You seem to miss the lack of collegiality the owned man’s vote raised on the part of the actual conservative/Constitutionalist judges with real character. Roberts is a fool and completely compromised. he lacks the strength of character to be on the high court. He is nastying up the bench.


281 posted on 07/22/2014 11:22:50 AM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
I have thought about it, a great deal.

Looking at the exact times associated with our posts, you thought about it for about 3 minutes.

Recommended reading ... "The Supreme Court" by William Rehnquist.

In that book, Rehnquist writes (on page 279)...

"If the Supreme Court wrongly decides that a law enacted by Congress is constitutional, it has made a mistake, but the result of it's mistake is only to leave the nation with a law duly enacted by the popularly chosen members of the House of Representatives and the Senate and signed into law by the popularly chosen president. But if the Court wrongly decides that a law enacted by Congress is not constitutional, it has made a mistake of considerably greater consequence; it has struck down a law duly enacted by the popularly elected branches of government, not because of any principle in the Constitution but because of the indidual views of desirable policy held by a majority of the nine justices at that time."

That my friend, is brilliant thinking.

315 posted on 07/23/2014 12:42:22 PM PDT by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson