[MUDDOG]

Rush just said the full court is 11, of which 7 democrat appointees.

Oh well.

[tanknetter]

Stacked court.

[House Atreides]

“Rush just said the full court is 11, of which 7 democrat appointees....”
********************************************************************************************
Well, at least 2 of the 7 may not be able to bring themselves to reverse today’s decision. The reason is that “legislative intent” only needs to be assessed in the absence of clarity (presence of ambiguity) in the actual language of the law. The language of the law related to subsidies and establishment of state exchanges is AS CLEAR AS PISS ON A SUNDAY MORNING. Any decision going against the clear legislative language would be nothing more than judicial activism.