Exclusive: Prosecutors' case against GM focuses on misleading statements
I am unclear on why Richard Blumenthal's or Barbara Boxer's 'satisfaction' is of any relevance. They are not acting in their capacity as stockholders, they are not members of the board of directors, they are not plaintiffs in a lawsuit, nor are they jurors in one.
They're senators, meddling in something that seems to me to be none of their business.
In the industry, there is a phrase, “five nines reliable”.
This particular part was better than five nines reliable. You can always make things better, but I don’t see a problem here. I’d have no problem owning one of these cars regarding this particular part.
Maybe the real problem is that all it takes to get a drivers license is the ability to fog a mirror.
And to be clear, I absolutely loathe GM.
Congress could easily strip GM of their BS liability immunity. If Congress really wanted to. If Congress had any inclination whatsoever to act in the best interests of our citizens.
Yeah, I know ...
Dear Babs, Please see Supenas and responses from DOJ/Eric No See em Holder. Specificly his response to those issued on Fast and Furious.
Um, yeah, I'm sure you do, Babs. But what do you call it when a politician or a government official doesn't respond fully and accurately?