Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hostage

43 posted on 07/17/2014 12:37:23 PM PDT by Sybeck1 (Remember Mississippi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sybeck1
Relax, guys. This was just a partial panel. It's by no means the final say.

This is the final say as far as the Mississippi state courts are concerned. Two of 9 justices recused themselves. (I'm guessing because of close ties to Cochran, but that's just a guess.) The remaining justices split 4-3 (4 holding that McDaniel has no right to examine unredacted voter rolls, and 3 saying that the Court should hear more evidence before deciding the case). So you had a quorum (7 of 9 justices participating), and you had a majority decision by that quorum (4-3). This is a final decision of the Mississippi Supreme Court.

60 posted on 07/17/2014 1:05:28 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Sybeck1

So Charles Johnson says to relax, that it’s not over.

Apparently of the nine judges, two didn’t participate and three didn’t rule either way, so four of them must have found against McDaniel, although I suppose of those voting it could have gone 3-1. The three who didn’t rule either way requested further information, so maybe it’s not over yet.

If some of you remember the poll book page that was illustrated after the election, verifying identity can be done because each voter had a unique number/bar code assigned to him or her. So redacting SS#, birthdate, phone #, and age shouldn’t be an issue. However, if they can charge for redacting, that is an issue.


61 posted on 07/17/2014 1:12:44 PM PDT by Norseman (Defund the Left-Completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson