Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fishtank

In the 1700s scientists all pretty much agreed on the Noah’s Ark theory, but when Darwin found hundreds and hundreds of new species that where unknown in Europe (as was the true size of the earth), that sunk the Noah’s Ark scientific paradigm.

And a new one arose.

They still wont all ‘fit’ on the Ark (together).

no matter how many bones the ICR claims are missing.


12 posted on 07/16/2014 10:30:36 AM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sickoflibs

> In the 1700s scientists all pretty much agreed on the Noah’s Ark theory, but when Darwin found hundreds and hundreds of new species that where unknown in Europe (as was the true size of the earth), that sunk the Noah’s Ark scientific paradigm.

Who’se to say some of the animals didn’t swim alongside the Ark during the Floox...: )

The new species might have been adaptations that evolved over time after the Flood.


24 posted on 07/16/2014 11:30:54 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson