Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservingFreedom
So if you find you're a vulnerable individual, don't smoke it. Peanuts can cause serious and even fatal allergic reactions in vulnerable individuals - should we ban them?

You realize that you're going to have to fight off the inevitable 'benefits' that these people will be seeking when they're unable (unwilling) to work in about 15 years...

34 posted on 07/16/2014 7:38:54 AM PDT by IncPen (None of this would be happening if John Boehner were alive...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: IncPen
You realize that you're going to have to fight off the inevitable 'benefits' that these people will be seeking when they're unable (unwilling) to work in about 15 years...

Not "inevitable" - and conservatives should be fighting those programs regardless.

35 posted on 07/16/2014 7:46:28 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen
You realize that you're going to have to fight off the inevitable 'benefits' that these people will be seeking when they're unable (unwilling) to work in about 15 years...

The "inevitable benefits?" I've been smoking and self-medicating with marijuana for 40 years. So have many of my friends and acquaintances. None of us receive government benefits because we have and continue to smoke pot. The only "direct benefits" that I receive from the government are the whooping tax bills that the government gives to me a reward for being an entrepreneur and producer of jobs and benefits for my several businesses and many wonderful employees.

36 posted on 07/16/2014 7:53:49 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson