More condescension. You’re making assumptions and generalizations about other people’s beliefs (or lack thereof). You don’t know them or what is in their heart.
How does it make sense to get something from nothing?
There is a scientific principle of cause and effect. Since we logically fit into the effect category, why could we not allow our Cause to be called God (however that term might be understood)?
how do you figure condescension?.
The articles point was atheist assigning less than honorable reasons to people of faith for there faith.
Guess what I agree some are just we or afraid..and some view God as a cosmic wishing well.
But some are seeking answers..seeking truth...so there is both noble in and ignoble reasons for faith.
but if you look at my post I also atheist have both noble and less then noble reasons for their beliefs on god of the lack of one.
Yet you seem be offended by the concept in any atheist mark might have less then noble reasons for their belief.0
What? Your beliefs are not to be examined and questioned the same way that others people beliefs are?......seem rather dogmatic?