Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasGator
“Thank goodness FDR let Wallace be replaced.”

‘Let’ is not the right word. Let me clarify. My only source in this is my old copy of David McCullough's TRUMAN, FDR told Wallace that he was his choice for VP, but the choice at that time was not FDR's alone to make obviously. FDR could have put up a real fight for Wallace but was convinced by his advisors not to. But letting it be thrown entirely to the convention and not doing more than making a basic statement that he would vote for Wallace were he one of the delegates, FDR let Wallace be replaced by Truman.

24 posted on 07/12/2014 12:20:44 PM PDT by tellw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: tellw

Uh, you are totally missing the anti-Wallace movement by major democratic leaders. FDR was not convinced by his advisors. Wallace was defeated due to political maneuvering by major democrats at the convention.


27 posted on 07/13/2014 7:20:42 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson