Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sphinx
That's not the same thing. The painter would be your independent contractor, not your employee.

As a general rule, principals are not liable for the acts of independent contractors. There are exceptions, but that's the general rule.

34 posted on 07/12/2014 4:30:01 AM PDT by Scoutmaster (Is it solipsistic in here, or is it just me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Scoutmaster; sphinx

I thought that was overly complicated a question.

If someone works for a bank as a teller, and they are called in on a Saturday morning with a 9am call because another teller is sick, and they were up until 4 at a party drinking, and they take a quick shower, hop in their car, and while driving to the bank run a stop sign and run into a day-care bus and kill a half-dozen kids, is the bank liable?

Should the bank have known that the person was likely to be partying on a friday night when not scheduled for work? Should they have asked? The person probably has minimal insurance, but can we go after the national bank that owns the branch for millions of dollars?

I don’t think this is equivalent either, since the truck driver is paid to actually drive a truck, and wasn’t just commuting to work.


54 posted on 07/12/2014 9:05:34 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson