To: WhiskeyX
I remember Camden from the 1960s when it was not much different from the description contained in this article, although concededly not as advanced at a time when the revolution of the Great Society began.
If, as the sentiment on this thread declares, the decline of Camden was caused by leftist programs like the Great Society, what was it about Camden, Detroit and elsewhere that required or at least justified the Great Society programs?
14 posted on
07/10/2014 2:33:09 AM PDT by
nathanbedford
("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
To: All
15 posted on
07/10/2014 2:35:46 AM PDT by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: nathanbedford; All
NO doubt, if one could chart it's decline, it should be fairly easy. Personal income
vs city's deficit (per citizen) as relates to unionized workfork/pension fund/-main't. $$.
It's Deeetroit all over (again)..When was the last time a Republican was in power there?
22 posted on
07/10/2014 3:15:24 AM PDT by
skinkinthegrass
(The end move in politics is always to pick up a weapon...0'Jihadist/"Rustler" Reid? d8-)
To: nathanbedford
...what was it about Camden, Detroit and elsewhere that required or at least justified the Great Society programs?That "what was it about" killed Trenton too.
44 posted on
07/10/2014 5:51:47 AM PDT by
Stentor
(Maybe the Goldman Sachs thing is just a coincidence. /S)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
