Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ohioman
Around 99% on FR realize that this lady did nothing wrong.

Well, if the bank had told her not to use that phrase, she certainly should have expected to be fired. The bank was well within its rights to tell its employees what to say or not say. However, it's also in my rights as a consumer not to use that bank if I disagree with its restrictive policy.

For the record, I don't actually believe there were legitimate complaints. I think the bank is making that part up.

42 posted on 07/08/2014 4:53:29 AM PDT by old and tired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: old and tired

As pointed out, the bank is contrary to federal law when it discriminates on the basis of age, sex, RELIGION, etc.

So, there is no right to harm.


44 posted on 07/08/2014 4:55:34 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: old and tired

Unless one is a disease-ridden queer, you can fire anyone for any reason. Of course you are correct when assuming that the bank is infested with liars trying to protect their public image. I hope the wealthy of KY pull their money from this bank.


65 posted on 07/08/2014 5:24:34 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson