There are a lot of questions to be answered. The challenge is that there are multiple overlapping spheres of inquiry and multiple layers within each of the spheres. Off the top of my head I’d say there are at least three spheres: the “reported” cause, the “response” (non-response) to the event, and the reason for an American ambassador being there in the first place.
They are inter-related areas of inquiry, and I am happy that it is the meticulous legal mind of Gowdy laying out the process.
Someone knows what the graffiti says, and its significance. I don’t doubt that that stone will be turned over in time.
An Ambassador is “normally” located at the Embassy and that would be in the Capital Tripoli!!!
So the BIG question is WHAT was he doing in Benghazi, (we probably know,) there was not even an official Consulate there, and if, then there would have been a Consular there for business???