I am very angry. I live about a mile from where this event happened. We do have some gang activity in this city, but for Gelhaus to be judge and jury because this kid walking along with an apparent firearm (which was actually an Airsoft gun that had foolishly been modified by removing the orange tip on the barrel) is just absurd. From the time the deputies stopped the patrol car to when Gelhaus lit up Lopez was a grand total of six seconds. I'm angry with Gelhaus, who I can't adequately describe without profanity, and I'm angry with Ravitch, who by all reports is hand in glove with all the police departments in this area, and I'm absolutely livid with our local electorate, who YAWNED and voted Ravitch right back into office in June, even though it was obvious she was stringing out this decision until after the election.
If it's true we get the government we deserve, then we are f****** toast.
To: Hetty_Fauxvert
I feel so bad for the boy’s family. I’m surprised he didn’t kill him within 4 seconds. There was no choice or chance for the boy.
2 posted on
07/07/2014 2:56:00 PM PDT by
windcliff
To: Hetty_Fauxvert
No one saw this coming...
3 posted on
07/07/2014 3:10:54 PM PDT by
Ken H
To: Hetty_Fauxvert
For Gelhaus to be judge and jury because this kid walking along with an apparent firearm (which was actually an Airsoft gun that had foolishly been modified by removing the orange tip on the barrel) is just absurd. Agreed. At the very least, the deputy should not be walking the streets as a LEO any longer.
4 posted on
07/07/2014 3:11:45 PM PDT by
TheDon
(Californians are losing their right to keep and bear firearms one firearm at a time.)
To: Hetty_Fauxvert
Sheesh.
This is around 70 miles north of where I live, so I don't know all the details, but from the little I gleaned this was pretty much negligent homicide, if not out and out murder. The young man was walking down the road with a rifle. He wasn't pointing at anyone, nor threatening anyone. The officer comes alongside and starts shouting at the kid, and being startled I don't doubt that he might have waved his rifle in the direction of the officer to tell him it was an airgun. Before any words are exchanged the officer shoots him dead...
Somehow the 'Right to bear arms shall not be infringed' does not apply if Mr. Policeman doesn't like the look of your jig...
6 posted on
07/07/2014 3:24:14 PM PDT by
El Cid
(Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
To: Hetty_Fauxvert
” I felt threatened.” Those words spoken after an event absolutely justify any law enforcement agent on or off duty for whatever use of his weapons or his fists he makes. If he says that phrase he is praised for following department procedures and given an extra paid vacation as his first reward. Further awards are given in a series determined by the intensity of negative public reaction- the more intense the higher and more numerous the awards. Check it out.
7 posted on
07/07/2014 4:13:29 PM PDT by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINEhttp://steshaw.org/economics-in-one-lesson/)
To: Hetty_Fauxvert
As former military, Leo and Corrections I say bullshit. Anytime you shoot a 13 year old 7 times, you made a mistake. PERIOD. You have no fire control ability and have no business carrying a gun in public.
10 posted on
07/07/2014 4:44:54 PM PDT by
SECURE AMERICA
(I am an American Not a Republican or a Democrat.)
To: Hetty_Fauxvert
I hope protesters descend on that city and shut it down —
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson