To: iacovatx
IBM’s solution was to encourage their laid off US citizens to move to India where they would be paid a mere fraction of their old salary but it would “go farther”.
13 posted on
07/06/2014 11:36:58 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
To: a fool in paradise
IBM’s solution was to encourage their laid off US citizens to move to India where they would be paid a mere fraction of their old salary but it would “go farther”.Wow. Did the top brass lead by example?
16 posted on
07/06/2014 11:41:57 AM PDT by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: a fool in paradise
HP says in order to stay competitive they want their workforce to be 80/20 by 2016. Guess who the 20% is? Offshore 80, onshore 20.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson