never happy
Um, I couldn't find that article in the constitution. I'll keep looking.
The gay couple that ran a company I worked for fired me one month to the day after my son was born. Proving I was a breeder was a bad career move...
I consider myself very lucky. I went to read the article but Salon crashed my iPad1.
“The U.S. Constitution protects gay peoples right to marry the person they love.”
Could someone point out where in the constitution that is found?
Where does it say that in the Constitution?
Sure... now the government is a Pope and is going to tell our churches who to hirend our families what kind of baby sitter to hire.
Forget about it. America has become the worst nation on Earth.
2 men or 2 women can live with and sodomize each other till the cows come home (cow-man relationships being the next thing the courts will legislate as marriage)
But marriage is between a man and woman and for the purpose of procreation and no perverted judge can convince me differently.
RE: The U.S. Constitution protects gay peoples right to marry the person they love.
Does it not also protect devoutly religious people from NOT recognizing or celebrating this “marriage”?
...remember Sodom.
Even the perversions of Ancient Rome did not recognise a gay relationship as a legal marriage. We have outdone the most perverse societies of yore.
Author needs to check his premises.
“The U.S. Constitution protects gay peoples right to marry the person they love.”
I stopped reading at the first line.
Amazing how today’s authors will flat out lie in their attempt to distort reality around their perverse proclivities. This author is a liar, willfully and knowingly trying to deceive others. Dismiss him.
Homosexuality is a judgement on America.
This needs to be pointed out consistently - homosexuality will not just bring judgement upon our country; homosexuality IS the judgement. Romans 1:26 starts with For this reason and continues God gave them up to vile passions. ..men with men committing what is shameful; so this is a judgement upon our society.
It also continues and says that they give approval to others for more and more evil acts. We see this today with our legislatures accepting
homosexual marriages and the teaching of it as acceptable in the schools.
Note also that Romans 1:32 points out that those who approve of such conduct are just as guilty as those who engage in it.
Ignoring this erroneous claim about "The Constitution", a person may marry the person "they" love PROVIDED THAT:
-They aren't closely related
-They are of legal age to consent
-They are not already married
-They are of opposite gender
----
There are plenty of marriage partners who are available to others and just not "you".
Very disturbing article, a true window into the homofascist mindset. “one we impose gay marriage on them” “we achieved or ends through the courts”
“Mark Joseph Stern is a writer for Slate. He covers science, the law, and LGBTQ issues”
He doesn’t understand basic biology or law, but he’s got the pink power issues covered!
The Supreme Court never said that homosexuals had a “Right” to marry. It only said that states could not deny federal benefits to homosexuals that were legally married in other states.
This entire chain of events started in 2004 when three judges in Massachusetts “ordered” the state legislature to approve homo marriage. Thousands of degenerates from other states flocked to Massachusetts to get married then went back to live in their own states. They returned home filing lawsuits against their state to legally recognize the sham marriage. So now this is where we are with this mess.
Yeah well ... our “Conservative” SCOTUS (no they aren’t. Corporate is NOT Conservative) will soon make them a protected class and it will be unconstitutional.
Does anybody really believe that homosexual couples will get fired from a job for marrying a same sex partner????
If this ever happens, a lawsuit will be filed, and the courts will rule such an action to be illegal. Punitive damages will result.
Technically, maybe this could happen. Author is scare mongering. I’m saying that realistically, in this politically correct culture of ours, no employer would dare fire a homosexual employee who married a same sex partner. It just wouldn’t happen.
In fact, few employers dare fire minority peoples due to fears of a civil rights violation. The same is true of homosexuals nowadays.