Revenge: Republicans to Strip $341 Million From IRS in Response to Scandals

The Blaze ^ | 7-4-2014 | Pete Kasperowicz

[matthew fuller]

Maybe they will have to sell some ammo....

[mabarker1]

Better yet give them $341.00 to run on. (Yes the digits and decimal point is correct)

[smoothsailing]

It’s a start. Here’s the wording from the actual bill (H. Rept. 113-508 - 113th Congress (2013-2014)
July 02, 2014, As Reported by the Appropriations Committee)

..............................

Internal Revenue Service

The Committee remains troubled by the activities of the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) including the inappropriate
singling out of certain tax-exempt groups based on their
political beliefs, wasteful spending on conferences and videos,
and providing bonuses to staff without evaluating their conduct
or tax compliance. In the fiscal year 2014 Omnibus
Appropriations Act, the Committee took steps to begin reforming
the IRS including requiring extensive reporting on IRS
spending, training and bonuses; prohibiting funds for the
production of videos that have not been reviewed or certified
to be appropriate; prohibiting funds for targeting groups for
regulatory scrutiny based on their ideological beliefs; and
prohibiting funds for targeting citizens for exercising their
First Amendment rights. However, the Committee believes that
more needs to be done to ensure that the IRS is appropriately
allocating its resources and is not using its authorities to
single out groups or individuals based on their political or
ideological beliefs. Given these concerns, the Committee cannot
support the Administration’s proposal to increase the IRS by
more than $1 billion over the fiscal year 2014 level. The
Committee recommends providing $10,950,000,000 for the IRS
which is $340,612,000 below current level and $1,526,527,000
below the request. This recommendation would fund the IRS below
their fiscal year 2008 level. In addition, the Committee
includes the following language to:

Prohibit funds for IRS employee bonuses and awards
that do not consider the conduct and tax compliance of such
employees;

Prohibit funds for targeting groups for regulatory
scrutiny based on their ideological beliefs;

Prohibit funds for targeting citizens for
exercising their First Amendment rights;

Prohibit funds for conferences that do not comply
with the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration’s
recommendations regarding conferences;

Prohibit funds for the production of videos that
have not been reviewed for cost, topic, tone, and purpose and
certified to be appropriate;

Require a report on the amount of official time
used by IRS employees;

Prohibit the White House from ordering the IRS to
determine the tax-exempt status of an organization;

Require extensive reporting on IRS spending; and

Provide TIGTA with a $1,625,000 increase to
enhance its audit and investigative oversight of the IRS.
The Committee also includes a funding prohibition to
prevent the Department of the Treasury from implementing their
proposed or revised regulation regarding the standards and
definitions used to determine the tax exempt status under
section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Committee
believes that the Administration should wait until the
investigations into the inappropriate singling out of certain
tax-exempt groups based on their political beliefs are
concluded before proposing make any regulatory changes
regarding section 501(c)(4). The Committee believes that the
resources used to promulgate this proposed rule could be better
spent responding to taxpayers correspondence and phone calls.
The Committee continues to be concerned with the IRS’ role
in implementation of the Affordable Care Act and the individual
mandate in particular. At a time when the IRS has demonstrated
little ability to either self-police or self-correct, the IRS
has even more authority over Americans’ health coverage. The
Committee finds this expansion of IRS authority to be
unacceptable and, therefore, prohibits funding to implement the
individual mandate and prohibits transfers from the Department
of Health and Human Services to fund the IRS’ implementation of
the Affordable Care Act.

https://beta.congress.gov/congressional-report/113th-congress/house-report/508/1

[ProtectOurFreedom]

Trials, convictions, incarcerations...I say toss in a death penalty or two for destroying our Republic and using political machinery to eviscerate the opposition, a first in our nation’s history.

[gaijin]

Let’s say that it was found the US military willingly made itself available to ONE party as a tool of political terror against the Democratic party, and that the likely outcome of that service was that a Republican had been elected at the last minute in a squeeker election:

Maybe the punishment would be NO General getting fired..?

Maybe the punishment would be NO General going to the brig..?

Maybe the punishment would be a budget cut of 3%...?

How many people here think that would play out?

Imagine further that in the course of the DOD investigation the new SecDef went up to Capitol Hill and said before the cameras that 7 hard-disks had crashed, and so further inquiry was IMPOSSIBLE and “these things happen”:

What would be the Democratic reaction..?

[Moonman62]

It’s been one wild party at the IRS since W started giving them big budget increases.

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

“Ultimately, they’ll cave.
No historical reason to believe otherwise.”

Not only that, but net funding to the IRS will ultimately increase. It’s a certainty.

[denydenydeny]

Drop. Bucket.

Democrats are supposed to be the ones who love idiotic symbolic gestures. Not Republicans.

[Washi]

$300 something million is probably a couple of days of operating expenses, which the republicans will either cave on publicly or re-instate behind closed doors anyway.

Nothing short of abolishment means squat.

The dumb-ass, party-line, "don't waste your vote", republican voters are too stupid to figure any of that out, however.

[Hipshot 6]

Cut the budget in half. Same with EPA and Justice. 3% what a joke. Ask Cantor what percentage his district is transfered away from Bratt?

[pepsionice]

Having worked around the gov’t, I’ll tell you the four ways to work around this issue. First, when folks leave, you leave the slot empty for a year...pocketing the money to make up for the loss. Second, you defer all costly training for one year....pocketing the money to make up for the loss. Third, you cut the bonus program to all employees GS13 and below to nothing while still running the program for the higher grades...pocketing the money to make up for the loss. Fourth, you cut the each division’s credit card usage for office supplies by a third....pocketing the money to make up for the loss.

There’s also a fifth method where you let go of the present contract folks for clean-up services in the buildings...opting for a newer crew who only comes in on Mondays and Thursdays.

I’ve seen all of these various tricks. They generally all work. The problem that you see is that for one year, it’s acceptable....when you start talking about this type of practice for two or three years...it gets to being demoralizing.

[Mortrey]

Not really revenge...congresscritters are COMPLICIT in what is happening to Americans.

THEY protect obama to protect THEMSELVES from accusations (well founded) of treason.

[MaxMax]

Obama added over 10-Thousand IRS agents, CUT THOSE then another 20%!

The Republicans are so damn stupid. Cowards!

[PGR88]

A cut of 3%?

HA HA HA HA HA

[Jonty30]

It’s probably closer to a 5% or 6% cut when you account for the cost of living.

I’d certainly cut them by 5% a year, until they are gone and set up an adjacent agency that cannot be politicized by anybody.

It’s a good time to have the new agency re-write the tax code as well.

[zeestephen]

Yeah, just like we “de-funded” or “repealed” ObamaCare.

All smoke, no fire.

[irv]

Ah yes. Republican leadership in action. A whopping 3% cut and a requirement that they stop doing things that are already illegal.

This punishment will be referred to as the “Pretty Please Act of 2014.”

[gleeaikin]

Of course major cuts will mean less enforcement of proper tax payments by the most wealthy who are the ones most likely to be auditied. Thus we lower income taxpayers will be subsidizing the wealthy tax cheats. We can see how well this program has worked in Greece and Italy, among other places. Think again, please.

[Jonty30]

You set up a twin agency who’s job it is to re-write the tax code so that it’s fair and reasonable with no favours to anybody.

[MayflowerMadam]

I believe I heard Steve Forbes make this suggestion last week on a news show.