>>a normal person with average intelligence and reasoning power could not do anything but convict that son of a b#tch.
Well, I’m pretty well above average (if you want my resume, send me mail) and I wouldn’t have come close to convicting him had I been on the jury. I watched probably 85% of the trial and the biggest questions were the ones not answered by the prosecution — not only not answered but ignored.
The prosecution’s problem was the same as your’s: they never took any other theory than Simpson doing it seriously so they never investigated alternative views to see what evidence there was. How many sources have you read on the Simpson case since the trial?
Being rich like him, IMO he is the kind of guy who would have paid someone in stead of committing it himself. He probably couldn’t resist making sure the deed was done though. That is the evidence you probably see. If you read about the casanova killer, his brother accuses him of the crime and he was in LA at that time.