Hillary Clinton ‘Bewildered and Confused’ By Supreme Court’s Contraceptive Rulings

Jul 4, 2014 Hillary Clinton said she’s “very bewildered and confused” by the Supreme Court’s ruling to further allow employers with religious objections to avoid offering contraceptives in their healthcare plans.

Just days after the Supreme Court issued its controversial Hobby Lobby decision and ruled in favor of a for-profit corporation seeking an exemption from the contraceptive mandate, the court issued an unusual order Thursday providing temporary relief to a non-profit college that also objects to the mandate.

Clinton, who is openly pro-choice, called the latest development “a serious breach of a woman’s right,” and called for government action: ”There has to be some action taken, in the Congress or by the executive to try to clarify what the court just did,” she said in an interview with ABC News’ Ann Compton.

On Monday, Clinton slammed the Supreme Court for their initial ruling in Hobby Lobby, warning that it was a ”really bad slippery slope” that should incite a “real outcry” from the American public.

I’m with hill! If you are a woman, you have the RIGHT to make your neighbors buy your private accoutrements! I’m going next door to demand tampons! Freeper women go out there and demand pills, IUDs, Kotex, poise, and of course vaginal baby deliveries!

If you need something for your hoo,
Have someone else pay for you.

Unlike Hillary, the three women on the Supreme Court immediately grasped the implications of yesterday’s SCOTUS ruling and were immediately furious about it. Even the 81-year-old Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who can barely keep her eyes open during Supreme Court sessions, was fully on top of things and not at all bewildered and confused.

Yet Hillary was in a self-admitted fog about the very issue — women’s rights, in this case the right to government-funded contraception — that she claims to be her number-one cause. With microphones in her face, she had a golden opportunity to help her cause by explaining to the public why the SCOTUS decision was a miscarriage of justice and why everyone should be angry about it.

But she couldn’t do this, because she was bewildered and confused, and probably had the vapors.

Would Elizabeth Warren, a former Harvard Law professor, have hesitated even an instant to explain the legal issues involved in such a way as to help the women’s-rights cause? No, but since she’s not being followed around day and night by the media like Hillary is, she didn’t get a chance to make the case for women’s rights.

Hillary is a burden to the Democrats. From the Republicans’ point of view, the longer she keeps taking up all the oxygen in the Democratic room, the better.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.