Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Proud2BeRight
So should we re-ban alcohol, the "I" in the overwhelming majority of DUIs?

So because there is one set of drunks on the road, you think we should add more ways to put even more impaired drivers on the road?

If adding is bad, subtracting must be good. Again: So should we re-ban alcohol, the "I" in the overwhelming majority of DUIs?

125 posted on 07/02/2014 1:49:43 PM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: ConservingFreedom

Once the genie is out of a bottle it cannot be returned. Colorado now has two out with their full blessing. I suppose there are even dope lovers who would like to see many more. Like drunks, dope smokers are losers to be avoided in life.


134 posted on 07/02/2014 2:04:53 PM PDT by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

To: ConservingFreedom
If adding is bad, subtracting must be good. Again: So should we re-ban alcohol, the "I" in the overwhelming majority of DUIs?

How about you do a quick web search and then tell us how many people are killed every year in drunk driving accidents. (And i'm not even asking about deaths from alcohol induced liver disease.)

And then you can tell us how things are so much better with that many people dying every year.

I have long suspected that an objective analysis of the pros and cons of prohibition would not work out so badly for prohibition.

195 posted on 07/06/2014 5:03:06 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson