Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dynoman
The wood pellets will definitely drive up the cost of electricity if they are replacing coal. The point is that they do not have to shut down the plant completely. They have to retrofit it to burn pellets too. This is still a lot cheaper than adding the equipment to make them compliant with the CO2 output requirements.
70 posted on 07/02/2014 8:30:27 AM PDT by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: woodbutcher1963

But why add expense for C02 removal when it won’t make a difference in atmospheric CO2?

By the same token - why spray urea in a boiler at $100-$500 per hour to remove NOx that won’t improve “regional haze” (commonly called fog) by any measurable amount?


71 posted on 07/02/2014 10:35:01 AM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson