Here’s the issue:
In these types of situations there are lots of people (plants) that step forward saying they have great info and want money for it.
Fielder was paid here. His story may or may not be true.
In one situation I know of the go-between guy was paying people and it later turned out their specific story was a fraud. This discredited the entire effort.
Here, McDaniel already has 1500-1800 votes in one county where Dems were allowed to cross over and vote improperly. That’s enough to order a statewide check to see if it exceeded the margin.
He doesn’t have to prove how every improperly cast vote would go, he just has to show there’s a number of them legitimately in question to surpass the threshold of the election being in doubt.
McDaniel should applaud the efforts here but not make it HIS effort. Let it take place parallel.
Great thing about the crossover ‘illegal’ (technically they are) votes is that it’s all in the voter roles. They signed voting Dem and then voted R. Chalk that as an improper vote.
The payoff is his word vs. this guy or that guy’s word. Text message yes but, “oh that was for knocking on doors. We only paid people to knock on doors, not to vote and never told him otherwise.”
His word vs. their word.
We agree.
>> Fielder was paid here. His story may or may not be true.
That’s why I advocate getting a sworn affidavit from him.
Opportunity without action amounts to nothing. This is a huge opportunity, attack on all fronts.
The story has not been picked up by Forbes.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3174632/posts?page=1