Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck; Fuzz

I could be wrong but I would think that “publicly traded” is not “closely held.”


23 posted on 06/30/2014 4:12:50 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: scrabblehack

And if publicly traded it probably couldn’t be subject to a rule like this either. Because then just who has the standard that deserves the deference? There could be a mechanism for getting standards worked in, such as shareholder resolutions.

The USSC probably did the best they could here. Some other case would have to come up involving shareholders before the principle could be supported by the Court.


25 posted on 06/30/2014 4:21:48 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson