I doubt it.
The only thing wrong with this decision in Hobby Lobby is that it was not UNANIMOUS instead of 5-4 on our side.
But you really have NOBODY on your side of the argument, other than the pro-aborts, who think it is a bad decision.
Do I need to be a lawyer to have credibility?
Shouting loud does not help your argument so maybe you can explain why you think this ruling is great and citing something other than your opinion of me.
There is nothing wrong with the decision and I never said there was. it is just small and weak.
It simply confirms the plaintiffs rights under The RFRA by treating a closely held for profit company the same as a nonprofit company. So big deal a law intended to scale back a previous poor SC ruling is upheld on very narrow grounds.
The only reason the plaintiffs won was the the Obama administration had already provided a work around to the issue for nonprofits who would attest to their sincerely held beliefs. That work around simply results in someone else, either insured people through premiums or taxpayers, paying for the coverage.
So despite this ruling I will still be paying for abortions. My small company will still be paying for them and if I object my employees will get them for free if I carry health insurance for the company.