Hobby Lobby Wins !: Where Do We Go from Here?

Christianity Today ^ | 06/30/2014 | Ed Stetzer

[Girlene]

Awesome news.

[Maurice Tift]

  We owe a lot to Hobby Lobby.

[Grampa Dave]

Thanks for the best laugh of the day and probably the week.

Of course the rats and their mediots will ignore this court decision.

[Campion]

Thanks be to God !!

[bigbob]

so, who really thinks this will put a dent in Obama’s “borrowing of authority” and “acting on his own”?

[jazusamo]

Great news. Libs took two hits today, this and Harris v Quinn.

[SeekAndFind]

A teeny tiny success, enjoy but keep on waving your pro life, heterosexual, liberty flag high.
Forward to life and freedom.

---

[Oldeconomybuyer]

“The first reactions from other news sources overread Hobby Lobby significantly. The Court makes clear that the government can provide coverage to the female employees. And it strongly suggests it would reject broad religious claims to, for example, discriminate against gay employees.
by tgoldstein 7:32 AM
Comment
- See more at: http://live.scotusblog.com/Event/Live_blog_of_opinions__June_30_2014#sthash.N2zhDl12.dpuf

[don-o]

John Hayward is one of the sharper knives in the drawer.

[Travis T. OJustice]

WOOT!

[BuckeyeTexan]

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

[Qiviut]

Evidently Kennedy is very troubled that this mandate/reg came from HHS/Sebelius and not a duly elected branch of government. I think he’s ‘on’ to something there .... [/s] although I’m very glad he’s troubled since there are lots of ‘regs’ being promulgated (EPA/HHS, etc,) to get what Obama/libs want done to transform America.

[FourtySeven]

Does anyone know how or if this affects the Little Sisters of the Poor’s case?

[Flint]

OK, now does the same principal apply to the cake maker?

[SeekAndFind]

RE: Evidently Kennedy is very troubled that this mandate/reg came from HHS/Sebelius and not a duly elected branch of government.

Well, this is something that we should be concerned about. WHAT IF it came from Congress, is he then going to side with the liberals?

[GOPJ]

I wonder if this case could set a precedent for the Christian wedding cake makers and photographers being persecuted by the state for refusing to participate in gay marriage?

I suspect this one will be revisited...

[don-o]

so, who really thinks this will put a dent in Obama’s “borrowing of authority” and “acting on his own”?

Can we please enjoy a win here?

[lquist1]

“We owe a lot to Hobby Lobby.”

Indeed we do. Not a lot of businesspeople these days have the courage to stand up for their convictions even when their living is on the line.

[left that other site]

Praise The Lord.

[Oldeconomybuyer]

Paraphrasing more from Justice Alito’s opinion: The dissent is concerned about the possibility of disputes among the owners of a privately held corporation about this coverage. State corporate law provides a ready means for resolving any conflicts by (for example) dictating how a corporation can establish its governing structure, and courts will turn to that structure and the underlying state law in resolving such disputes. -

See more at: http://live.scotusblog.com/Event/Live_blog_of_opinions__June_30_2014#sthash.ydeCcrXN.dpuf