Yes, that’s probably it. Agree with you on all those points, except I don’t interpret her take on Cochrane’s strategy as “gushing” (it strikes me as factual and dispassionate) and throughout the rest of the article she makes the case for selling candidates based on Conservative ideals by doing so int black churches, not buying black votes.
I’m still waiting on the link. But no rush; I’m patient.
This is a gushing characterization:
“But most incredible was the success of this game plan – to reach out to liberal black churches and get Democrat black voters to turn out and vote for Cochran”
But considering she’s describing something that happened only in her head, perhaps she can be forgiven.