Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives, Losing One Battle Doesn’t Mean We Have Lost The War
Townhall.com ^ | June 30, 2014 | Kurt Schlichter

Posted on 06/30/2014 4:14:28 AM PDT by Kaslin

I was furious that Thad Cochran slimed his way to victory, but every time we hardcore conservatives lose a battle, it seems a contingent of bitter-enders starts up about how the Republicans and Democrats are exactly the same, and how they’ll refuse to vote in the general, and how they’ll take their collective ball and go home.

That’s crazy talk. We can get even with the GOP establishment later; we need to beat the Democrats first.

Now, many of my good friends disagree with me here, but I respect them enough to say what I think. And I think that when we focus on the establishment’s antics in Mississippi instead of focusing on November, we make Barack Obama happier than if he got to play 18 holes with the ghost of Karl Marx.

Let us assume that Thad Cochran didn’t play fair. Now let me assume the role of your father:

Life is not fair.

Yeah, I was shocked – shocked! – that our opponents refused to commit ritual suicide in order to allow our chosen candidate to waltz into the nomination that, a couple weeks ago, was his for his taking. Was anyone expecting the establishment to go quietly, to rollover, to not use every tool at its disposal to hold on to power?

We’re conservatives. We’re not supposed to make excuses, but I’m sure hearing a lot in the wake of Cochran’s win.

Yeah, his win. News Flash: Thad Cochran got more votes than our guy. That means our guy failed to perform the most important function of a conservative politician.

He failed to win.

Hell, he couldn’t handle the GOP establishment calling him a racist. Why does anyone imagine he could have handled the Democrats doing it in November? They’re the pros!

Yeah, Cochran dared to appeal to Democrats…who voted for him. It would be nice to have other Republicans embrace this innovative concept.

Am I happy about the slanders Cochran’s buddies spread, or about the way the K Street crew spent zillions to keep Thad awake and away from the livestock long enough to get nominated?

No, but that ship has sailed and sank. Winners leverage their assets into victory.

Am I suggesting that we forgo our vengeance? Never! I’m all about payback. But getting even with these K Street creeps can wait. I say defeat the Democrats first. Instead of choosing to fight two opponents at once, we can deal with these establishment tools later from a position of strength when Reid’s reign is just a bad memory.

I’m getting sick of this quitter talk about how we can’t possibly win, about how everyone’s against us, about how this struggle being hard is some sort of cosmic injustice perpetrated upon us by mysterious forces beyond our control.

George Washington and his men ate their damn shoes as they shivered in Valley Forge. That’s adversity, not having to somehow find the strength to carry on after nominating a Republican who is sure to win in November and has a mere 88 percent conservative rating.

This isn’t about our feelings. This isn’t about our “principles” either. There is no principle that compels us to allow Barack Obama to retain a Senate majority that absolutely will confirm a Supreme Court justice who will absolutely vote to:



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-156 next last
To: mrsmel
Which is exactly what Cochran and his supporters did to conservatives, and it's not the first time, They oppose conservatives with much more zeal than they ever show in opposing Hussein...

I know, right!?

They'll likely lose MS and this event has taught everyone about the similarities and difference [if much at all] between Dem and GOPe.

The lines are clearer and that is good IMO. I hope we can get the Senate without Cochran.

61 posted on 06/30/2014 6:08:17 AM PDT by Principled (Obama: Unblemished by success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: GilesB
Vote for the gop establishment? HA! How many times will you forgive your adulterous wife? I’ve done so at least every other year since Reagan’s last term. I’ve decided she is just a round-heeled tramp who will always let any liberal wanker have his way with her. She’s not going to change. I’d rather have an empty bed than to smell the musk of randy dems on her every night!


62 posted on 06/30/2014 6:08:23 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (I'm a Christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite. The GOP hates me. Why should I vote for them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel
when a couple of Cochran shills characterized our reaction as “hurt feelings”?

Was that the 'what a bunch of thumb-suckers' with a few pity party's thrown in?

Gee. the people who want my support and expected it all these years just called me racist and 'won' by inciting the welfare class to commit voter fraud!

Did those posters really think those childish insults would have any effect?

63 posted on 06/30/2014 6:09:05 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a Person as created by the Laws of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel
The likes of Cochran won’t multiply Cruz’s and Lee’s strength.

I didn't say it would. You must have replied to the wrong poster in your zeal to attack someone, anyone!

64 posted on 06/30/2014 6:09:36 AM PDT by Principled (Obama: Unblemished by success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Principled

I want a majority too. 60 Mitch McConnels and John McCains is no different than 60 democrats. Removing progressives is my goal. (D) or (R) makes no difference to me.


65 posted on 06/30/2014 6:11:04 AM PDT by SpeakerToAnimals (I hope to earn a name in battle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: GilesB
“We can get even with the GOP establishment later; we need to beat the Democrats first.”

How about in the next White House run, when they foist yet another liberal on us? Will that be too soon? And they will foist another liberal, after we swallow this. They already do now, they'll really be emboldened if they get away with this. Some amnesty shill.
66 posted on 06/30/2014 6:14:09 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Principled

I have not attacked any poster here, but I will attack leftists in conservative clothing from sun to sun.


67 posted on 06/30/2014 6:16:18 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Seems the GOP-E is more interested in fighting the Tea Party than the Dems. We didn’t pick this fight, they did, starting in 2010 and coming to a head with this fiasco.


68 posted on 06/30/2014 6:16:25 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Essentially, the Establishment Republicans and Democrats are one and the same.


69 posted on 06/30/2014 6:17:02 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The reason why conservatives don’t win is because instead of uniting like the left, they divide. Don’t blame the left, blame yourself

Who is doing the dividing here? Hint - it isn't the Tea Party. It was the GOP-E that slimed us. And they will continue to slime us if they end up winning in MS.

70 posted on 06/30/2014 6:18:42 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan

None whatsoever. Wack birds, racists, obstructing Obama’s agenda (would that it were so).


71 posted on 06/30/2014 6:19:01 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel
I have not attacked any poster here...

I suppose that's a matter of opinion. But what is clear is that the Dems and GOPe love to see us giving it away.

In fact, I would not be surprised to learn that some of the Dem/GOPe kids are here promoting it. Sleepers even.

72 posted on 06/30/2014 6:19:51 AM PDT by Principled (Obama: Unblemished by success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Principled

Yes, that was implied in another thread. Are you implying it regarding me? Would that be an attack?


73 posted on 06/30/2014 6:23:56 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Seems to me that the author doesn’t realize that it’s hard to fight the enemy at your front (Democrats) when you’ve also got enemies at your back (GOPe). First priority needs to be the people who will backstab you or else they’ll do it at the time you need them most. It reminds me of the scene in Braveheart where William Wallace is betrayed by the nobles on horses right in the middle of a crucial battle. Also, his point of view is so short sighted. He is like the person who doesn’t understand why we don’t negotiate with terrorists. The last thing we want to do is give credence to the Chochran strategy for future GOPe politicians to emulate.


74 posted on 06/30/2014 6:27:32 AM PDT by Drrdot (Ban murder, not guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Principled; mrsmel
In fact, I would not be surprised to learn that some of the Dem/GOPe kids are here promoting it. Sleepers even.

Projection for the purpose of baseless personal attack.

How Alinsky of you.

75 posted on 06/30/2014 6:35:54 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a Person as created by the Laws of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan

Yes. But defend the men who have unequivocally attacked conservatives, namely Thad Cochran. I held my nose and voted for Romney. I said never again, and I meant it. Cochran has outstripped Romney by a mile in backstabbing conservatives. I will vote for McDaniels for Senate, he’s a conservative. I will never vote for Cochran or any rat, for any reason. And it’s some irony for anyone to accuse those of us who won’t vote for Cochran, who blames conservatives for obstructing Hussein’s commie agenda, as “sleeper leftists”.


76 posted on 06/30/2014 6:41:02 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Principled

No certainly not but it is all around us. Most of them are easily spotted though. They don’t hide so well.

You do seem anxious to attack tho - tough day already?


77 posted on 06/30/2014 6:45:12 AM PDT by Principled (Obama: Unblemished by success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan

Wow it’s alinsky to assert that there are trolls on FR?

Who knew?!


78 posted on 06/30/2014 6:46:05 AM PDT by Principled (Obama: Unblemished by success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Principled
Wow it’s alinsky to assert that there are trolls on FR?

No, only to insinuate that your debating opponent is one when you've run out of arguments.

79 posted on 06/30/2014 6:48:58 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a Person as created by the Laws of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Drrdot
It reminds me of the scene in Braveheart where William Wallace is betrayed by the nobles on horses right in the middle of a crucial battle.

Good analogy. I can definitely see Barbour and McConnell as the Scottish noblemen in todays battles.

80 posted on 06/30/2014 6:56:59 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (I'm a Christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite. The GOP hates me. Why should I vote for them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-156 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson