Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

They’re not discriminating against a woman; they’re just saying the government doesn’t have the right to force taxpayers to pay for their birth control so they can have sex free of consequences.


3 posted on 06/30/2014 4:00:55 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jsanders2001

If the court rules against Obama today its going to send him the rest of the way over the edge.


5 posted on 06/30/2014 4:03:34 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: jsanders2001
...they’re just saying the government doesn’t have the right to force taxpayers to pay for their birth control ...

It's not even that - they're just objecting to two of the dozens of contraceptives that they _will_ provide.

All this over 2 of 26 contraceptives? The objections are over the 2 that allow conception then abort the baby. So I think there is more to this than meets the eye.

Why would they fight this so hard if they don't really lose anything?

11 posted on 06/30/2014 4:10:09 AM PDT by Principled (Obama: Unblemished by success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson