Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/29/2014 1:19:29 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

If they can get The First Amendment killed .it’s all over for the US


2 posted on 06/29/2014 1:24:28 PM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Udall is up for re-election this November in New Mexico.
What a fine time to let him feel the power of the people.

Oh, and here is the complete list of Senate co-sponsors from the body of the bill:

Mr. Udall of New Mexico (for himself, Mr. Bennet, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Schumer, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Tester, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Coons, Mr. King, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Franken, Ms. Klobuchar, and Mr. Udall of Colorado) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary


4 posted on 06/29/2014 1:27:12 PM PDT by plangent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Sounds like Communism , and one Party politics !!
When did they forget to represent "We The People "
you know the little people who vote ?


" Our brand new First Amendment would not contain a single word of restraint regarding the regulation of political speech.
Instead, powerful congressional incumbents would wield complete and total control over all money to be raised and spent by their competitors
and by everyone engaged in any way, shape or form in the debate."
5 posted on 06/29/2014 1:31:20 PM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt (Political Correctness is Tyranny .. with manners ! Charlton Heston)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

They used to teach in school that the Bill of Rights was the shining example for the world of what the USA was all about, and that it was sacrosanct and untouchable. It used to be thought that no one would ever dare to even suggest modifying a single word in the Bill of Rights,

That’s obviously changed now!


6 posted on 06/29/2014 1:31:27 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Is it time to submit for all politcal Partys to say :
We are BORG ! You all belong to me !!" ??


7 posted on 06/29/2014 1:33:58 PM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt (Political Correctness is Tyranny .. with manners ! Charlton Heston)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Tyrants. The type the founders warned you:
12 posted on 06/29/2014 1:54:27 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Tyrants. The very type the founders warned you about:

13 posted on 06/29/2014 1:55:18 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
A few extra items about the Udall Amendment that weren't mentioned in the article:

1 - the amendment would give each State the same authority regarding State elections that it gives Congress for federal elections.

2 - the amendment also allow for the regulation or prohibition of "in-kind equivalents", which sounds like saying anything supporting or opposing a candidate (even if no money is spent or raised).

3 - even though the amendment says that it does not permit Congress to abridge freedom of the press, it does not say the same thing regarding the States; this suggests the powers each State would be given could be used to control all forms of the news media within a State's borders.

Even though this amendment has no chance of being adopted (for now at least), it does show that a growing number of Democrats have become so arrogant that they feel that they can openly call for the silencing of their critics.

15 posted on 06/29/2014 2:00:17 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

they want to take out free speech on the very core subject it was put in there to guarantee - political speech.


16 posted on 06/29/2014 2:11:14 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The Second Amendment is there to guarantee the sanctity of the First. These azzholes better think about that.


17 posted on 06/29/2014 2:20:42 PM PDT by 43north (BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% RED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Only 44 RATs? Make ‘em all run on that.


19 posted on 06/29/2014 2:47:51 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Do The Math)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Total list of cosponsors; Date Signed:
Sen. Bennet, Michael F. [D-CO]* 06/18/2013,
Sen. Harkin, Tom [D-IA]* 06/18/2013,
Sen. Schumer, Charles E. [D-NY]* 06/18/2013,
Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]* 06/18/2013,
Sen. Whitehouse, Sheldon [D-RI]* 06/18/2013,
Sen. Tester, Jon [D-MT]* 06/18/2013,
Sen. Boxer, Barbara [D-CA]* 06/18/2013,
Sen. Coons, Christopher A. [D-DE]* 06/18/2013,
Sen. King, Angus S. Jr. [I-ME]* 06/18/2013,
Sen. Murphy, Christopher S. [D-CT]* 06/18/2013,
Sen. Wyden, Ron [D-OR]* 06/18/2013,
Sen. Franken, Al [D-MN]* 06/18/2013,
Sen. Klobuchar, Amy [D-MN]* 06/18/2013,
Sen. Udall, Mark [D-CO]* 06/18/2013,
Sen. Johnson, Tim [D-SD] 06/19/2013,
Sen. Menendez, Robert [D-NJ] 06/19/2013,
Sen. Reed, Jack [D-RI] 06/19/2013,
Sen. Blumenthal, Richard [D-CT] 06/20/2013,
Sen. Heinrich, Martin [D-NM] 06/24/2013,
Sen. Merkley, Jeff [D-OR] 06/27/2013,
Sen. Feinstein, Dianne [D-CA] 07/17/2013,
Sen. Begich, Mark [D-AK] 07/17/2013,
Sen. Cardin, Benjamin L. [D-MD] 07/23/2013,
Sen. Gillibrand, Kirsten E. [D-NY] 09/09/2013,
Sen. Hagan, Kay [D-NC] 10/08/2013,
Sen. Mikulski, Barbara A. [D-MD] 10/28/2013,
Sen. Baldwin, Tammy [D-WI] 10/28/2013,
Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA] 10/28/2013,
Sen. Warren, Elizabeth [D-MA] 11/20/2013,
Sen. Brown, Sherrod [D-OH] 04/02/2014,
Sen. Walsh, John E. [D-MT] 04/02/2014,
Sen. Durbin, Richard [D-IL] 04/02/2014,
Sen. Reid, Harry [D-NV] 04/28/2014,
Sen. Hirono, Mazie K. [D-HI] 04/28/2014,
Sen. Carper, Thomas R. [D-DE] 04/29/2014,
Sen. Murray, Patty [D-WA] 04/30/2014,
Sen. Schatz, Brian [D-HI] 05/01/2014,
Sen. Sanders, Bernard [I-VT] 05/06/2014,
Sen. Rockefeller, John D., IV [D-WV] 05/08/2014,
Sen. Stabenow, Debbie [D-MI] 05/12/2014,
Sen. Booker, Cory A. [D-NJ] 05/20/2014,
Sen. Heitkamp, Heidi [D-ND] 06/02/2014,
Sen. Manchin, Joe, III [D-WV] 06/05/2014
21 posted on 06/29/2014 2:57:37 PM PDT by SES1066 (Quality, Speed or Economical - Any 2 of 3 except in government - 1 at best but never #3!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Repeal the First Amendment? Hell No!!!


24 posted on 06/29/2014 3:48:20 PM PDT by ExCTCitizen (I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
I thought it took a lot more than a vote in Congress to amend the Constitution.


26 posted on 06/29/2014 4:33:57 PM PDT by magooey (The Mandate of Heaven resides in the hearts of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

What has happened that 44 senators, RAT or not, would want this to happen...


28 posted on 06/29/2014 4:37:45 PM PDT by uncitizen (Buckle up! We're on the Facism Fast Track!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson