Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mandaladon

If it’s a “woman’s turn” at the presidency, why not go for broke with a more unambiguous leftist like Liz Warren? Why stop at Hillary?


14 posted on 06/28/2014 10:29:08 AM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ted Grant

Good point. There are lots of more liberal or radical Democrats, who think of the Clintons as too conservative, too centrist, too triangulating for them. They prefer their politicians to be full blown liberals.


18 posted on 06/28/2014 10:33:56 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Ted Grant

Don’t ever forget HELLry is a far left Alinsky communist who is even more radical than obamatollah.

Add the fact HELLry’s longtime “wife” and pillow-pal belongs to MoBroHood/al-queda terrorist network.


23 posted on 06/28/2014 10:38:03 AM PDT by newfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Ted Grant

I think that’s exactly what they will do. Warren will come fresh on the scene like Obama and take the stage from old hen HRC.


24 posted on 06/28/2014 10:41:05 AM PDT by informavoracious (Open your eyes, people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Ted Grant

Lol....YES! Fauxcahontas would be a “two-fer”, not just the first woman president, but the first president to lie about being a Cherokee.


52 posted on 06/28/2014 12:29:14 PM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson