Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel

No, really! Some liberal judge found a weaselly reason to say the constitution doesn’t protect me from the tyrants in Denver. I am shocked!

I would like to object specifically to this phrase “ passed in response to mass shootings at an Aurora movie theater”. For their attack on my rights to have been in response to the Aurora shooting they would have had to happen right after it instead of after all the Democrats involved were safely reelected.
Never forget, never forgive.


3 posted on 06/27/2014 11:24:49 AM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: thorvaldr

I would also like to object to “A law may be constitutional, but nevertheless foolish, ineffective, or cumbersome to enforce,” Kreiger wrote in her ruling.” She specifically avoided ruling on the constitutionality of the law by throwing the case out entirely on legal standing. She did not make, and can not support, the determination she claims in her ruling.


4 posted on 06/27/2014 11:27:38 AM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson