[House Atreides]

“...If that’s the way it is in Mississippi, it will be impossible to tell a) if a person had voted in the Dem primary on June 3rd....”

***************************************************************
As the insurance commercial says “that’s not the way it works, that’s not the way any of this works”. The Mississippi electoral process records which (Republican or Democrat) ballot the person was given. The voter is NOT given both; the voter tells the poll workers which ballot he wants to have for the primary vote.

[Viennacon]

Thank you for the clarification! Then this PROVES illegality!

[Norseman]

>>The Mississippi electoral process records which (Republican or Democrat) ballot the person was given. The voter is NOT given both; the voter tells the poll workers which ballot he wants to have for the primary vote.<<

Do you know this for a fact? There’s a lot of speculating going on here today.

If what you say is factual (it’s certainly not the case in my state, where we also have open primaries), then all McDaniel would have to do is tally up the clearly illegally-cast ballots and argue with statistics.

Because Cochran was lobbying for DEM votes, if you can show that 10-15,000 votes were illegally cast, a judge should have no trouble overturning the runoff election.

But are you absolutely certain that the pollworkers record which ballot they take officially?