You may rely on me to dismiss any comment from a stranger that includes juvenile name-calling. Your apparent claim to a higher plane of existence is not only laughable but immediately nullified by your own idiopathic displaced anger.
In fact, your response was such a non sequitur I still am not convinced you were responding to me specifically, especially as I was paraphrasing the other side as a means of emphasizing its intellectual bankruptcy.
This latest response of yours is irrefutable proof that you didn’t read my first one. Are you one of these people who demands ‘dialogue’ while shouting over the other person or ignoring the very response you have solicited?
Demanding I provide a ‘solution’ is a red herring. The solutions exist already in statue. One person, one vote. Your personal circumstances may matter to you greatly but I repeat: the law was followed in your case. That certainly does not mean it follows suit everywhere and anywhere.
If you are able to see through the red mist, we are agreeing on more than you may care to admit. I am not advocating for federal one-size-fits-all anything.
I see flame wars crop up only rarely on FR and wonder how and why they start but your rabid misanthropy provides some insight as does your fingers-ears-la-la-la conclusion.
statue => statute