Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CARTOUCHE

Oh dear. Have you any toys left in the playpen or have you thrown them all?

My comment, echoed by many others on this thread, is that the Democrats are the ones who, in a sudden, isolated burst of libertarianism that must feel very strange to them, suddenly declare that we need NO laws on the books since the offense in question NEVER happens. Following their cod-logic, we can remove homicide statutes from the books in locations where no murders occur.

A conspiracy isn’t necessarily a massive thing. Two people agreeing to break the law is a conspiracy by definition. But precincts registering 100% perfect vote totals for Candidate X or precincts reporting 105% turnout are a fairly large and noticeable. A poll worker, with motive and opportunity to fiddle numbers who was tried and convicted of fraud and still proclaimed she was doing the right thing, is most certainly an ‘instance.’

A researcher in Florida recently discovered 600+ double registrations in just a few precincts.

It’s a logical canard dismiss specific examples as instances, since instances make up trends and small-scale vote fraud becomes large-scale vote fraud through simple arithmetic without any central controlling authority required.

I’m not sure how your situation is relevant since you followed the law and so did the government. The question both of us should ask is: why haven’t all states and all precincts? Keep the seed from germinating and the plant will never grow.

The only proof I require is that those who are most vociferously opposed to the simple standard of a fair election are the ones who stand to benefit the most from fraud. As above, their sudden civil-liberties epiphany is not only unprecedented, it is hypocritical in the extreme.


38 posted on 06/26/2014 8:29:22 AM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: relictele

Your snide dismissal of a fellow Freeper’s comment is all I need to know about you and I’m still waiting for your solution. That any of us here disagrees with you does not make us an enemy of the state.

I suspect more federal intervention would appease your obsession with voter fraud? Every state has its priorities and that is what helps to keep the ‘rights’ in States Rights.

All that is necessary to fight instances of fraud is to punish it with severe and I mean severe means.

No need to respond. I have more important work to accomplish
than to read the bilbous froth from the likes of you.


46 posted on 06/26/2014 9:06:47 AM PDT by CARTOUCHE (9999 EOM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson