Skip to comments.
Want to Disprove Man-Made Climate Change? A Scientist Will Give You $10,000 if You Can
The Blaze ^
| June 25, 2014
| Liz Klimas
Posted on 06/25/2014 12:24:02 PM PDT by Twotone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
"Keating...wrote on his blog that he would be the final judge of any entries and would provide his comments on why any entry fails to prove the point.
1
posted on
06/25/2014 12:24:02 PM PDT
by
Twotone
To: Twotone
2
posted on
06/25/2014 12:26:17 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: Twotone
Also he’s engaging in the usual fraud of elastic terminology.
Why take the bait, anybody. Though he might be hooted at in independent commentary.
3
posted on
06/25/2014 12:27:57 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: Twotone
I see so the default position on the subject is that it’s true despite the fact that there’s no scientific evidence to support the theory. And, oh BTW, we should destroy our economy based on that default position?
4
posted on
06/25/2014 12:28:06 PM PDT
by
Renkluaf
To: Twotone
How do you prove a negative?
5
posted on
06/25/2014 12:28:37 PM PDT
by
oldbrowser
(We have a rogue government in Washington)
To: Twotone
As Charlie Rangel would say, “Chump change”. Is this all the fool is willing to lose? Why don’t he PUT SOME MONEY where his big mouth is. Ten grand isn’t worth anybody’s time.
6
posted on
06/25/2014 12:29:03 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Feed the wacko enrviromentalists to the starving polar bears.)
To: Twotone
Ever heard of the mini-ice age? The climate changes... even before the SUV.
Where do I pick up my check?
7
posted on
06/25/2014 12:29:10 PM PDT
by
pgyanke
(Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
To: Twotone
A “scientist” wants people to prove a negative? Didn’t he encounter a course in logic somewhere in his science education?
8
posted on
06/25/2014 12:29:13 PM PDT
by
muir_redwoods
(When I first read it, " Atlas Shrugged" was fiction)
To: Twotone
A physics professor High Priest in the Cult of Global Warmism is so fed up with the claims
9
posted on
06/25/2014 12:29:13 PM PDT
by
SIDENET
To: oldbrowser
That’s what atheists argue.
To: Twotone
It's a very common fool's wager.
Offer someone a sum that sounds large, but which is far less money than it would cost to do the comprehensive research work.
He is saying: "We have spent hundreds of millions of dollars building our castle in the air - we'll pay you ten thousand if you can dismantle it with one blow."
To: Twotone
I would think it would be as hard to disprove it as it is to prove it. Climate changes. It’s done so throughout this planet’s history. It may well be changing now. But how much of that is the natural course of events and how much is due to man? I don’t know how you can quantify one over the other.
To: Twotone
![](http://www.iceagenow.com/Pacemaker_of_the_Ice_Ages-1.jpg)
Please contact me here so I can tell you where to send my check.
To: Twotone
God is doing it. If he can’t disprove God then pay up ahole.
14
posted on
06/25/2014 12:31:27 PM PDT
by
longfellow
(Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
To: Twotone
LOL. How do you prove to a religious zealot that he worships a false god?
15
posted on
06/25/2014 12:31:39 PM PDT
by
ChildOfThe60s
((If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
To: Twotone
OLD 3-way incandesce light bulb, hold hand about 1 foot away, turn bulb on low, then medium, then high. Can a difference be felt?
From “Watch Mr. Wizard”.
16
posted on
06/25/2014 12:32:30 PM PDT
by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: Twotone
will award prize money to anyone who uses the scientific method to prove that human activity has not been a factor leading to climate change. Playing word games. Everything that physically happens in the world is a factor. The butterfly in the Amazon analogy.
He is very safe making the bet but it still proves nothing.
17
posted on
06/25/2014 12:32:39 PM PDT
by
pfflier
To: DoodleDawg
Nobody has definitively traced out “sensitivity mechanisms.” Nobody knows if the world is primed for negative feedback, positive feedback, or just to jolly well barge on doing what it wants to do, when it wants to do it, no matter who tries to help or hinder.
18
posted on
06/25/2014 12:33:02 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: FlingWingFlyer
But a win would be big and worth millions in the court of public opinion.
Conservative blog sites would have a great time. It could easily sink the AGW ship.
19
posted on
06/25/2014 12:33:16 PM PDT
by
dhs12345
To: Twotone
Dr. Keating must have a book coming out. “Look at me, everybody, look at me!”
20
posted on
06/25/2014 12:33:36 PM PDT
by
workerbee
(The President of the United States is PUBLIC ENEMY #1)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson