Did you get that from the CEO of Sonasoft...The software and archive back up they sell would have had the e mails in archive on a server not tied to Lerner’s computer, as law requires....
HOWEVER the IRS attorneys bought the software only and not the ARCHIVE CAPTURING SERVER service, therefore there is NO E MAIL TRAIL. So was it intentional and illegal by attorneys not to have archives of the e mails, or stupidity? Maybe they were worried that e mails would be archived and that could be a liability.
All IRS attorneys and employees involved should go be prosecuted and go to prison. Ms Aragon was right that Lerner only had the software, however, that wasn’t legal. As was learned in latest questioning of IRS Commissioner.
I watched it. Why did they buy any software if they had no interest in backing up or archiving? Was it some sort of payback scheme for campaign contributions? Something smells rotten.
Kackikat, thanks for pinging me, but that must have been someone else. I haven’t posted about the IRS software...I’m not computer-smart enough to do so, LOL.
The CEO of Sonasoft was on Greta Van Susteran, so view my comment to which I just replied to you.... since it was you I disagreed with. I sent the comment to Aragon but it wasn’t her...so you were right about what they bought, but I was right that archiving was what Sonasoft offered for e mail archiving, but the IRS attorney s did not buy it. So Lerner did not comply with law.