Very few Americans died as a result of going after Saddam because they died in the days, weeks, months, and years after Saddam was dead? Solid reasoning.
If the goal was to knock off Saddam and sons, they should have assassinated him and been done with it.
Wanting to prevent the needless deaths and maimings of America’s kids is now a progressive talking point?
Bush screwed up and Obama continues to screw up.
Stupid libs can’t admit it about Obama. Sadly, some self-professed Conservatives can’t admit that Bush screwed up.
They tried assassination in Syria. It failed numerous times. Assad is still there and is now helping Iraq by flying air missions on ISIS.
Wanting to prevent the needless deaths and maimings of America’s kids is now a progressive talking point?
Nope. Linking removing Saddam with the deaths that occurred over many years of an insurgency, while we hopelessly tried to save the jigsaw puzzle Iraqi nation, is a progressive talking point. Has been for about 7 years. Removing Saddam and Sons costs very few US life's.
Bush screwed up and Obama continues to screw up.
He definitely should not have tried to keep the Iraq nation together, if he was not going to act like Saddam. Perhaps he felt introducing democracy to the Islamists in the region was worth the gamble. Did not agree with that myself and I pulled my support for him during his last two years, but his removal of Saddam was a grand success. Superb military invasion plan.
Obama has done the worse things possible. Every progressive always does. Like clockwork.
Stupid libs can’t admit it about Obama. Sadly, some self-professed Conservatives can’t admit that Bush screwed up.
Just did, but that was not the subject of your incorrect progressive talking point.