Yes, I know what “standing” is.
The Supreme Court isn’t going to accept a case, hold hearings, write decisions and then announce the plaintiff has no standing.
> Yes, I know what “standing” is.
>
> The Supreme Court isn’t going to accept a case, hold hearings, write decisions and then announce the plaintiff has no standing.
I think you missed the dry cynicism [and possibly sarcasm] in my post — the underlying point I was illustrating is that this court has neither the integrity nor inclination to address the real problems in the case, they will avoid responsibility/accountability where they can, and when they cannot they will pull shit out of their asses whereupon we’ll be told that it’s the golden-standard of wisdom, that they’re the ones who decide what is and isn’t constitutional, etc.