WELL deserved, and WAY over-time...
WMD? Mustard gas (WWI)? C’mon man, we weren’t going to go to war over mustard!
“Nuclear Weapons” are WMDs. (weapons of MASS destruction). That was the justification used, nukes! There is no proof that they were even capable of making nuclear weapons, let alone be able to deliver them any real distance.
We went to war over mustard and yellow cake? (Yellow cake from Niger was a hoax used to scare us into war).
“Bush lied, thousands died” turns out to be a true statement.
I think the assassination plot against his dad (Bush 41), had a lot more to do with getting Saddam Hussein than mustard & cake.
The Israelis proved how to deal with the Iraqi nuclear threat............ BOOM!
Hard to believe you haven’t been zotted yet.
Your posting history is quite telling.
As if you actually ever knew...
FWIW Bush cited Hussein’s continued violation of UN resolutions as the justification for invading Iraq. The WMDs were a supporting point.
I know you’re a liberal because everything in your post is based on self-delusion, political lies and historical revisionism.
Mustard gas and sarin are both WMDs.
“A “weapon of mass destruction” (WMD or WoMD) is a nuclear, radiological, biological, chemical or other weapon that can kill and bring significant harm to a large number of humans or cause great damage to man-made structures (e.g. buildings), natural structures (e.g. mountains), or the biosphere. The scope and application of the term has evolved and been disputed, often signifying more politically than technically. Coined in reference to aerial bombing with chemical explosives, it has come to distinguish large-scale weaponry of other technologies, such as chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear. This differentiates the term from more technical ones such as chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons (CBRN).
That part I can agree with. As for the rest, pure libspeak BS.
boom
Falsely named troll poster JohnGalt, is that you?
Three mustard gas shells were rigged as IEDs, and a sarin shell was rigged as an IED.
IF those weapons didn’t exist, as you leftists claimed, how did they get there?
ONE shell is proof.
Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Viking Kitty/ZOT ping list!. . . don't be shy.
Nope, those are real sarin gas shells in Iraq. I had troops that had to deal with a lot of that stuff.
Bush Derangement Syndrome.
You’re so ignorant you’re not even worth talking to.
faucetman…
you’re back?
What took you so long?
I see your posts are the same.
Oh really? Just exactly how did bush lie???? Before I begin, are you suggesting that there was no evidence of uranium being found in Iraq? Are you also suggesting that Hussein never had chemical weapons?